FauxNEWS

FauxNEWS

We Distort, Then Deride

FauxNEWS RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Environmental Moonbats

I can’t say I’m appalled by what they’re doing. In fact, I applaud the moonbats who have decided not to have children.

Some quotes from the article that are really telling. Of course, I will follow this up with a bit of personal commentary, as well. I think it’s genetic on my part, to point out the absolute stupidity of idiots.

Because when Toni terminated her pregnancy, she did so in the firm belief she was helping to save the planet.

Incredibly, so determined was she that the terrible “mistake” of pregnancy should never happen again, that she begged the doctor who performed the abortion to sterilise her at the same time.

At the age of 27 this young woman at the height of her reproductive years was sterilised to “protect the planet”.

Toni relishes her decision with an almost religious zeal.

“Having children is selfish. It’s all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet,” says Toni, 35.

“Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population.”

You know… I don’t think I can even peruse the article any more. There is just too much lunacy there. You’ll have to read it for yourself to really see what I mean. “Religious zeal?” You know it. Her “god” is Gaia, and she worships as blindly as those who murder others while killing themselves with strap-on semtex garments in the name of “Allah.”

Just a few points… Why must a new life add to the “carbon footprint?”

I happen to work with a lot of power conversion equipment. If we balance my life’s work with pollution-eliminating equipment, I’d say I’d probably come out on the “less carbon” side of the equation. In other words, I’ve commissioned and calibrated enough pollution-reducing equipment, that I’ve more than overcome any negative impact my consumerism might have caused.

I won’t even go into the cerebral gymnastics necessary to determine that aborting a child is a good thing for the planet. I will say, however, that the Darwin Principle of this nut case eliminating her genes from the gene pool is definitely a good thing for the human race in general.

All in all, these nuts just make me shake my head in wonder. I think that if they’d take a little course in logic, they’d see how absolutely groundless their conclusions really are.

Read the whole article. And thank the subjects for helping improve the planet for our kids, by making sure there are fewer idiots to contend with.

One Response to “Environmental Moonbats”

  1. 1
    NAT PIERCE:

    For America’s benefit, all Conservatives should encourage and support married Conservatives to have a single worker household, have three children, and keep those children out of government schools.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

November 2007
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Blogroll

Meta

Recent Posts

Tags

Categories

Recent Posts

Polls

How long will it take Obama to break his promise of only raising taxes on 5%?

  • Whenever he does it, he'll blame George Bush for it. (100%, 1 Votes)
  • He'll keep his promise, and not raise taxes on most people. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • He'll wait until he takes office. No later than Jan 30, 2009. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • He'll pretend, like Clinton did, then announce the increases in April, 2009. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • He will do it during his first year in office. (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 1

Recent Comments

Author Profile

    This is the default text. To change this, add some info about you in the Admin area